I found the most interesting part of this chapter to be the metaphor
between sand and people. It is something I had never come across before.
Usually, we do not think of sand and consider it's components, but analyzing
this metaphor helps understand it. Sand is made up of many different components
and they are each different. This is what makes it similar to humans. The
entire human population can be split. We usually look at these things in the
romantic understanding of sand in general or the entire human population.
Classical understanding analyzes and begins to split both up due to
differences. Sand particles are different colors, representing the different
races. There are different sizes of particles, just like there are different
people. Some are shorter, others taller. These things then result in the creation
of an opinion, which leads to distortion to clarity we have when we are
younger. This process never ends. There is always something separate to differentiate
by, and sooner or later there is one person in each group because each person
or sand particle is unique. I found this interesting, especially because it
ties in so well to what we have been discussing in class. This chapter even included
the IQ scale and helped the reader understand who Phaedrus is because he had an
IQ of 170. He fit the description of the stereotype of being introverted and
socially awkward, which we also discussed in class. I thought this was a
coincidence that helped me understand the novel much more.
I agree with Shannon on how the sand is a metaphor, however I do not think that that metaphor is limited to just people. Everything in life can be subdivided into individual classifications, whether it be people, animals, or sand. Life and the earth is so big and diverse that the romantic view of the concept of life is far to vast to completely grasp. On the other side of the spectrum, in the classical view, all of the different groups and subgroups of life are so intertwined that it is difficult to grasp that concept as well. As the narrator explains, life, or in his case a motorcycle, must be viewed as both a whole and as a combination of parts which the whole is dependent upon. When the narrator mentions the Buddha is everywhere, he is expressing this concept. The Buddha, which is what he states life is dependent upon, is in every individual aspect of the organism, as well as in the whole organism which is why the narrator states that we must see both.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete