Comment on Zane's Post

As we learn more about Phaedrus and the way he think, I find him very frustrating. He does not tell us the exact meaning of Quality, but I do believe it has a positive connotation. I would really like the answer to what he means, along with the rest of the novel. Who is Phaedrus? This still seems to be the ongoing question. I guess I would not consider myself a classical thinker in this scenario. So I do disagree with Zane on this point. There is beauty in things that are left unexplained, but this does not seem to emit beauty. I think it is good that people want answers to new questions. It gives the individual a type of purpose, which is what I have interpreted the narrator to do in regards to understanding Phaedrus. I think you can never stop learning or digging for new information. You may need to look for something, and maybe it requires effort, but no one will ever know everything they need to know on a certain subject. I just want to know why the narrator cares so much about Phaedrus and his past. For some reason, I gave up o the theory that Phaedrus is an actual ghost.