In this weeks reading the author managed to make absolute
sense and absolutely no sense at that the same time. As he discussed with idea
of “subliminal self” I will discuss the parts of the reading that are
convenient to me and my understanding of the novel. His discussion of facts at first
confused me to no end, as it seemed to confuse those who discovered the
internal contradictions between scientific and mathematical laws that are meant
to be absolute truths. It begins with the idea that one main truth leads to the
discovery of multiple smaller, more specifics truths. This truth is referred to
as a simple fact. These simple facts though vague, are the most important
because they serve as the foundation for the other facts to be built upon. When
one of these facts is proved to be wrong, or at least potentially wrong is disrupts
all of the other facts connecting to it, potentially destroying the system.
What seems to be the catch is that this fact is all true and untrue at the same
time. In the creation of the facts we “discover them” out of a need for them,
we subconsciously pick them. However these facts are simply definitions that
humans have created to find some sort of order in the world, one that can
ground us when the ever-powerful wind gust of philosophy threatens to throw us
up in the air. It is the search for beauty, the classic beauty that Poincaré
finds such power in. This beauty is essentially that grounding in the idea of
absolute truth. The idea that there is a “harmonious order” of laws that govern
the universe and keep it consistent. Without this beauty I feeling of unease
threatens that psyche as we are forced to acknowledge a complete lack of
control, understanding, and knowledge of what is to come. It may be that all
known science is just mankind’s attempt at comforting ourselves in our
uncontrollable lives. If math and science can be proven wrong then order does
not exist.
No comments:
Post a Comment