1. Quality
is the framework of how everything is, yet it will always be undefinable
because it is in the nature of the idea. Quality is the central concept behind
how we perceive everything in reality. Quality is the key – “A real
understanding of Quality captures the
System, tames it, and puts it to work for one’s own personal use, while leaving
one completely free to fulfill his inner destiny” (283). Quality can be
discussed through the perception of the classical thinker but can only be truly
realized by the romantic thinker. Yet one needs to have a deep understanding of
this duality to be able to realize the entire picture and see Quality.
2. We
are all subject to bounds within the way we must think. It is said that the
Church of Reason emphasizes the inability of the learner and not so much the
ability. The Church of Reason is still vital to the process by which we deduce
how things are. If we were not limited in one set way to think, then there
would not be resultant repercussions of those who think outside of the box. The
Church of Reason serves its highest value in the attacks that we make against
it. It is the format by which we can chip away at the old to understand the
new.
3. The
classic clash between Romantic and Classical Thought – the “Subject-Object Duality”
(517). Where Quality is the midway point between these two: reality, romantic
falls under the pre-intellectual study and classic falls under that of the
intellect (317). Classical then can be subdivided further into studies that are
subjective and pertain to the mind and the object which pertains to the ‘matter’
of things. Romantic Thought will follow under the emotions of the body that is
why it is considered pre-intellectual, and the classical though than focus on
what goes on after the pre-intellectual. Quality is the solution to this
classic problem.
4. The
Internal Struggle within the narrator connects everything in the book; it is
the foundation that Pirsig lays in order to voice the philosophy that is Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance.
The struggle that the narrator is having within himself is not evident at first
but slowly builds as we learn about the nature of the subject that the narrator
jumps right into. The struggle is shown though throughout the book, right under
the nose of the reader but does reveal itself until the end. The whole reason
for the trip that the narrator is taking across the countryside is in order to
find his Zen. The old vs. the new, the fear of the rise of technology,
parenthood, and the feud between Phaedrus and Institutional Authority all
exemplify the struggle of the narrator.
I like the third topic the best. You can go in depth with classic and romantic thought, as well as the midpoint (quality). This brings the book full circle. I think the weakest topic is the second one. This is only because you have stronger arguments for the other three and the Church of Reason comes up at the beginning and then is somewhat lost.
ReplyDeleteI like your idea about the internal struggle the most. I think this one is the most interesting and it will be fairly simple to find support from the text. Since his struggle builds as the book progresses, you'll be able to write your paper in chronological order of the events in the book. I think the topic on Romantic and Classical thought is my least favorite. The one on Quality is my second favorite. There is a lot of evidence and support that you can use from the book, and I think your paper would be interesting. The bounds on thinking topic could also work, but you may be a little more limited in terms of quotes and textual evidence.
ReplyDelete