Sub-topic: The different opinions regarding technology
Technology
is one of the central topics throughout the whole of Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance. Its presence in everyday
life evokes different opinions and perceptions by the main characters, the most
notably being the variation in outlook by the narrator in comparison to John
and Sylvia. The narrator accepts and embraces technology wholeheartedly, while
his friends are unable to see the positive attributes.
The
narrator’s perception of technology is extremely positive, as he receives a
large amount of enjoyment from using and interacting with it. One thing that
demonstrates his love for technology is his constant need to take care of his
motorcycle. This seemingly obsessive desire further supports his appreciation
of technology as a whole; he values it enough to spend such a large portion of
his time dedicated to ensuring that his motorcycle is getting the proper care. Maintaining
his motorcycle has become an activity that he now finds enjoyable; at one
point, he claims that “it seems natural and normal to me to make use of the
small tool kits and instruction booklets supplied with each machine, and keep
it tuned and adjusted myself (9-10). The narrator is acutely aware that
technology’s place in society is only growing, so his decision to embrace it and
make use of it is beneficial for himself.
Opposite from the narrator’s point
of view, both of the narrator’s traveling partners, John and Sylvia, have a far
less accepting perception of technology. They are unable to see the benefits,
so they focus purely on the negatives, never taking the time to use it
themselves or appreciate it, much unlike their fellow traveler. While it seems
that the large majority of individuals have a positive outlook with regard to
technology, John and Sylvia refuse to conform to society’s values. Their
defiance of the norm can be viewed as a good thing, as they are following what
they themselves believe in, rather than what others value. However, in the long
run, their division from technology will prove to be detrimental. John and
Sylvia may want to detach themselves, but they have to acknowledge the progress
that technology has made. If they refuse to recognize the positive attributes,
then their isolation from a great amount of progress in society will ultimately
be a bad thing. Unlike the narrator, John would prefer someone else to deal
with his attachments to technology. “He [John] prefers to let a competent
mechanic take care of these things so that they are done right” (10). Both John
and his wife have at least some understanding as to how technology affects
them, due to the fact that they possess technological items, most apparently
their motorcycle, yet they have an undying need to be isolated from it. “Sylvia
is completely with him on this one. In fact she is even more emphatic. ‘It’s
just a whole other thing,’ she says, when in a thoughtful mood. ‘I like
garbage,’ she says, when not. They want not to understand it. Not to hear about
it. And the more I try to fathom what makes me enjoy mechanical work and them
hate it so, the more elusive it becomes. The ultimate cause of this originally
minor difference of opinion appears to run way, way deep” (11). John and Sylvia’s
disapproval of technology is one of the central topics that separate them from
the narrator.
Technology’s presence in society is
controversial among individuals, based on the difference in beliefs as to
whether or not it should play such a large role in the world. The central
characters of the novel, the narrator; John; and Sylvia, all have varying
opinions on the subject. While the narrator chooses to embrace it for all of
its positive attributes, the others have a completely different outlook, always
searching for someone else to deal with it. A difference in opinion regarding
technology is of the main differences that exist between the narrator and John
and Sylvia.
I found your first entry to flow very well as you have developed some good arguments on technology so far. My only criticism is that the last sentence of the long paragraph and then the final paragraph are simply reiteration of what you have successfully proven in your opening entry. If anything you should simply break that all down into one sentence that may find its way near the end of the paper when you are culminating the entire argument. I found your quotes to be very appropriate and feel your paper has gotten off to a good start. I will be interested to see the rest.
ReplyDelete